Showing posts with label Rajashekhar Devarai. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rajashekhar Devarai. Show all posts

Friday, February 6, 2009

20090207gb - “I should continue to be grateful and thankful to so many” :







"I should continue to be grateful and thankful to so many" :


February 06, 2009 : Friday


Rajashekhar Devarai







Write up inspired by Deborah Norville. The new Science of happiness and good health : Thank you is the operative phase/Deborah Norvill.- Readers Digest, February 2009, 50(2), 62-70pp. The write up is an extract from the Author's work : "Thank you power."





It is so coincidental that I pick up Readers Digest Feb 2009 issue for a casual reading. I very well know how valuable it is to read RD as often and as regularly as possible. Thank you RD for introducing me to Deborah and there by couple of psychologist.




I firmly believe that basically as an individual in society I have always valued the grace, the help, kind wishes, warm support, a lovely pat, a kind look and a timely advice (in the times that were hard to digest and face by the near and dear ones). I trust myself and I firmly believe that I have thanked all those kind and graceful people from time to time since my childhood. I am really proud of myself for being grateful to people who showed their concerns towards me directly and or indirectly.




Ø How can I forget my parents who reared me up and dreamt big about me?


Ø How can I forget my uncles and aunts who poured their unconditional love and affection towards me?


Ø How can I forget my two grandma's who were overwhelmed just to see me and feed me all the time?


Ø How can I forget my uncle who taught me swimming and what not. How can I forget that moment when I received a gift of new clothes that were brought from Gangtok by my uncle?


Ø How can I forget my father patting me and even after failing miserably in the exams.


Ø How can I forget my teachers who trusted me in advance.


Ø How can I forget my friends who extended their helping hand in times of hardships.


Ø How can I forget my teachers and friends who talked to me in english and made me speak english.


Ø How can I list the people who cared me who supported me, who groomed me, who held me high, who treated me as one of them. … when actually I was no one?




It is a futile attempt on my part to remember all those great soul who matter a lot for shaping my personality. The list is endless. The ideas expressed by Deborah are quite acceptable. Indeed the psychologist works cited in the write up viz David Patrik Columbia, Robert Emmons, Michael McCullough are valuable in this regard. According to Emmons, "gratitude is a demanding quality, a rigorous quality. It is a discipline, an exercise. According to Emmons gratitude may not come easily, but it can be developed in the following ways :




Ø Record your Thanks


Ø See the patterns


Ø Catch the boomerang


Ø Seize the moment




Thank you Basava for giving me an opportunity to read papers like this, thank you ... for blessing me for making so many kind people around me. Thank you .... for gracing me to be grateful to you, my parents, my small family, my dear, dear and intimates, divine souls close to my heart and soul, my relatives, my friends my bosses and my colleagues.




If at all I have impacted people around me, it is only because I have not left any stone unturned to thank them, respect them and revere them.




If at all I am powerful it is only because I don't get tired in thanking. Bless me Basava/.......to keep me busy in thanking and respecting others.




Rajashekhar Devarai


Lotus5673@yahoo.co.in




Librarianship is a noble profession.




1816gbgv





Get perfect Email ID for your Resume. Get before others grab.

Monday, February 2, 2009

20090203 - A reflection by Rajashekhar Devarai on Arun Maira's paper "global meltdown"

February 3rd 2009

A reflection of a Librarian on "A matter of trust/Arun Maira.-Times of India – February 2, 2009, page 16(centre page).

This educative centre page article by Management consultant Arun is educative and sensitizing. It is specially useful to commoners and non-finance-non economists to grasp a minimum of understanding about concepts like : recession, global meltdown, global slowdown, global meltdown etc. The much valued freedom that the business need, the extent of accountability and responsibility that is required of them towards government and society are well brought out in the paper.

A reasonable and significant ethical level of conduct on the part of businessmen; transparency and required flexibility of rules and guidelines on the part of Government and a trust and belief of people towards both Government and Business work towards building sound global economies. As brought very well by Arun business which always wanted less and less interference by government, now wants their unquestioned and unlimited support both in terms of finance and moral backing. It is true, these troubled times need fundamental changes in the ways governments function, in the way businesses function and in the way people empower and trust governments and business. Are we all to move forward towards a disciplined flexibility and a reasonable balancer between freedom and equity.

What do we think about this as librarians? Directly or indirectly, to a more or less extent we too are business, a different servicing business. Apart from asking more and more in terms of salaries and perks and of course budgets; we need to learn the economics of financing of the libraries, our duties and accountability towards all stake holders , I mean the institution we serve and the government and people at large.

As librarians let us learn more and more lessons of being sensitive, responsible and accountability and lateral thinking, at these troubled and hopeless times. Shall we pledge to be out of the box, shall we restart ourselves to prove our social relevance and indispensability. We have come of age. Let us re-affirm ourselves, and continue our age old affinity with knowledge and its power.

Rajashekhar Devarai

Librarian

lotus5673@yahoo.co.in

blog : http://indialibrarian-intl.blogspot.com



Librarianship is a noble profession.
1816gbgv


Get rid of Add-Ons in your email ID. Get yourname@rocketmail.com. Sign up now!

Thursday, December 18, 2008

LEADERSHIP AND SELF - DECEPTION : GETTING OUT OF THE BOX / ARBINGER INSTITUTE-A BOOK REVIEW by Rajashekhar Devarai & J .Padmavathi

_________________________________________________________________________________

LEADERSHIP AND SELF - DECEPTION : GETTING OUT OF THE BOX / ARBINGER INSTITUTE-A BOOK REVIEW by Rajashekhar Devarai & J .Padmavathi

"We should look long and carefully at ourselves before we consider judging others"(Moliere,1666).

1.INTRODUCTION

1.1 Ever since the conduct of Hawthorne experiments which lead towards the historical finding of Hawthorne effect during 1920s and 30s by Elton Mayo and other Harward researchers at Western Electric Co. , there is a steady increase in the studies correlating productivity and creativity to that of human/ social relations at work. Applied: Sociology, Economics , Political Science and Psychology have contributed a lot deciphering the hitherto mysterious/unknown factors which contributed substantially for industrial productivity. The importance and relevance of the knowledge base of Social Sciences need not be over emphasized in many fields, be it in productivity, creativity or Technology. Of late people skill organizations and scholarly consortiums with professional manpower specializing in Business, Economics, Law, Education, Management, psychology, Sociology, are very effective in extending solutions to institutions and organizations on a turn key project basis. One of such organizations is The Arbinger Institute whose recent book titled , "Leadership and the Self Deception ..... " is under special focus here for a review. The institute has classified the title under Business/Psychology.

1.2.IMPORTANCE OF THE THE STUDIES ON SELF
The concept of "self' is very unique in Philosophy and in all sciences and social sciences whose focus directly or indirectly is on Human Nature. It will be very useful to readers of "Fashion and Beyond" in the context of this book review, to have meanings and conceptual clarifications of the concept of self
and its various manifestations. These conceptual clarifications and meanings assist to understand the stand point of the book under review.

1.2.1. Self: Generally speaking self refers to the individuals conception of him/herself "Self is that aspect of the personality consisting of the individuals conception of himself. The way a person perceives himself is a result of his experiences with other people, the way they act toward him, and the impression he gets of their view of him"(Scot,1988).

1.2.2. Self Betrayal : Based on Oxford Dictionary of synonyms and antonyms(1999), Self Betrayal could be defmed as traiting on oneself, being false on oneself, Conspiration on oneself.

1.2.3. Self Deception: Synonyms to the word self deception are: bluff, cheat, deceit, fraud, lie etc. (Oxford Dict. Of Syn. & Ant : 1999). Self Deception according toMartin,M.W(19995) is, "a purposeful action to avoid unpleasant truths and painful topics (about oneself or the world); it is an unintentional process of denial, avoidance, or biased perception; it is a mental state resulting from such action or process, such as ignorance, false belief, wishful thinking, unjustified opinions, or lack of clear awareness. Thus parents tend to exaggerate the virtues of their children, lovers disregard clear signs of unreciprocated affection, overeaters rationalize away the need to diet, patients dying of cancer pretend to themselves that their health is improving. Philosophers and thinkers likeJoseph Butler, Kierkegaard, Hiedegger, Sartre, and Fingarette have substantially dealt on the concept of Self Deception" (Martin, 199 5).

1.2.4. Looking glass self: The Term was introduced by C.H.Cooley(Mind, Self and Society) in1902. Looking glass self is a persons' perception of himself as determined by the way he imagines he appears to others. It is the conception of self that is formed as a consequence of the attitudes other people have toward him. (Scot,1988)

1.2.5. Generalized Other : " A generalized and integrated conception of the expectations, attitudes and meanings of a group, an abstract social class, or the other significant persons in a social situation, that has been incorporated in the thinking of an individual and helps to determine his behavior. A person develops a generalized other through the process of social interaction, first by taking over the attitudes, expectations and points of view of significant other persons." G.H.Meads contribution is also is note worthy in this
regard. (Scott,1988).

1.2.6. "I": A hypothetical aspect or phase of the total self corresponding to what the individual regards as the unique aspect of his self. The term was used by G.H.Mead who suggested that the "I" and the "Me" together constitute the personality or self.(Scott,1988).

1.2.7. "Id" : In Freudian theory, the aspect of the personality that consists of unorganized, innate, instinctual impulses seeking immediate gratification. (Scott, 1988).

2.Focus of Management Consultancies and the realm of Self: It is quite interesting to note that there are organizations which are ready to tackle human relation and people skills problems of a wide range of industries and institutions. It is note worthy that an Institution like Arbinger works at the level of "self analysis" for interpreting the results and productivity of an organization.

2.1 Though the concept of Self, Self Betrayal and Self Deception are quite old as for as their coverage in philosophy and social sciences is concerned, their usage in solving practical problems of institutions and organizations is some what novel and interesting. The contents of the present work are relevant at individual, family, group and organizational level.

2.2.The book Leadership and Self Deception is chapterized into the following heads like : Self Deception and the Box, How we can get in the box, and How we get out of the box. The narration in the book runs in the form of dialogues between Senior executives Bud, Kate, and Lou of a company named Zagrum and a new entrant named Tom. They explain how self deception comes on the way of organizational progress by giving their own individual experiences. The instances and incidents brought out in this narration or more appropriately novel are meticulously worked out to be relevant and to the point. The Arbinger team equates some one under self
deception to be in "the box".

2.3. The Contents of the book can be summarized in the following points :

l.Self betrayal leads to self-deception and the "the box";
2.when you are in the box you cant focus on results;
3.your influence and success depends on being out of the box.;
4.you get out of the box as you cease resisting other people;
5.don't try to be perfect, do try to be better;
6.don't look for others boxes, do look for your own;
7.don't accuse others of being in the box, do try to stay out of the box yourself;
8.don't give up on yourself when you discover you have in the box. Do keep trying.;
9.don't deny you have been in the box when you have been. Do apologize, then just keep marching forward, trying to be more helpful to others in the future.;
10.don't focus on what others are doing wrong. Do focus on what you can do right to help;
ll.don't worry whether others are helping you. , do worry whether you are helping others.

3. To sum up Self Deception may be encountered by any individual. It starts with self betrayal leading towards being in the "BOX" and the individual will have a distorted view of himself and others around. The material brought out in the book is relevant to individuals in all walks of life including their family life and work place. Once the demon of SELF DECEPTION is rampant, both the individual and organizational progress will be in doldrums.

4. THIS WORK (LEADERSHIP AND SELF DECEPTION PRODUCED BY THE ARBINGER INSTITUTE) IS "A MUST READ" PIECE FOR ALL THOSE OF US, WHO HAVE NATURAL INCLINATION FOR KNOWING THE SECRETS, MYSTERIES AND WHIMS AND FANCIES OF OUR SO CALLED BEHAVIOUR, WHICH HOLDS THE KEY TO UNDERSTAND AS TO WHY WE BEHAVE THE WAY WE BEHAVE TOWARDS OTHERS AND AS TO WHY OTHERS BEHAVE TOWARDS US THE WAY THEY BEHAVE. DEFINITELY IT WILL BE A STEP FORWARD IF WE ATTEMPT TO UNDERSTAND HOW AND WHY WE BETRAY OUR OWN SELF AND HOW AND WHY WE GET INTO THE TRAP OF SELF DECEPTION AND GET INTO THE SO CALLED "BOX". WHAT A RELIEF TO FEEL THE EXPERIENCE OF GETTING OUT OF THE "BOX", AND WHAT A DELIGHT TO LOOK AT THE WORLD THAT LOOKS ENTERELY DIFFERENT ONCE WE ARE OUT OF THE BOX. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW IS BEST SERVED IF IT RAISES THE CURIOUSITY OF ADMINISTRATOR, TEACHERS, DESIGNERS AND TECHNOLOGISTS, SCIENTISTS TO READ THE BOOK.

5.The Arbinger Institute
The Arbinger Institute , a Management training and consulting firm and Scholarly consortium ,responsible for the contents of the book, was founded to translate the teams important work on self-deception - and its solution - into practical effect for individuals, families, and organizations worldwide. To cite from the book, "self deception is at the heart of the organizational failures. It is the reason many organizational problems seem so intractable - at their core they are self-deceptions; they resist solution." Members of Arbinger apply their energies to helping organizations reduce people problems and increase bottom-line results. They do this by helping clients implement Arbingers three phase Results System. Phase I of the system is introduced in this book. The change work of the institute is lead by philosopher Terry Warner and Duane Boyce, Jim Ferrel, and Paul Smith contribute to the deliberations as Managing Directors.

Address:
The Arbinger Institute www.arbinger.com 800-307 -9415

6. Bibliographic details and source of the book:
Leadership and Self Deception/ Arbinger Institute.-San Fransisco : Berret¬Koehler Publishers. 2000.
Berret-Koehler Publishers.Inc.450 Sansome Street, Suite 1200, Sanfransisco, CA 94111-3320. Tel: (415) 288-0260, Fax: (415)362-2512. www.bkconnection.com

7. References

1) Moliere.1666.Le Misanthrope. Quoted on pageno.318 IN ~ollins Concise
Dictionary .-Glassgow:Harper Collins.
2) Scot,W.P.1988.Dictionary of Sociology.-Delhi:Goyal Saab.
3) Oxford Dictionary of Synonyms and Antonyms. 1999. OUP :
Oxford.
4) Martin,M.W.1995. IN The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy /Robert Audi.-Cambridge : Cambridge Uni. Press.

Reviewers:

Rajashekhar Devarai, M.A., MLI.Sc., Head Librarian-Resource Centre and Centre Coordinator-Fashion and Beyond: National Institute of Fashion Technology, Madhapur, Hyderabad-500032, India. Tel:+91-040-23110842(office), +91-040¬23001998(Residence).
Email: lotus5673@yahoo.co.in

J.Padmavathi, B.Sc.,MLI.Sc., LA-Resource Centre, National Institute of Fashion Technology, Madhapur, Hyderabad-500032.India. Tel: +91-040-23110843 (office), +91¬040-27561519(residence ).
Email: padmavathilbnrcnifthyd@yahoo.co.in


lotus and divinity

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Plug the Security holes - Radha Kumar - Article review by Rajashekhar Devarai


Plug the Security holes/Radha Kumar.- Times of India - Mumbai : December 17, 2008. - Article Review by Rajashekhar Devarai.

Essay by Radha Kumar of Jamilia Milia I slamic university is indeed very timely. We do hear a lot from various quarters on the proposed national Investigating Agency. Every one now is very clear as to the security lapses with regard to Mumbai terror trauma. Radha Kumar has tactfully dealt with issues and topics like that proposed coastal command, Amendments to CISF ACT. He rightly emphasixed on the three areas of reform viz intelligence, gathering and communication, specialist training, and equipment and coordination between the Federal and State ministries, Intelligentiaa and the commoners both are suggesting aloud to look at the US model in this regard. India's concerns issues and problems are not much idfferent than that of US. What I personally feel is that we need not look for US experience as a model. Our so called apex body or agency should get evolved keeping in view our social, cultural, geographical and political climate in mind. Any blind following may land us in new problems and circumstances.'

Mr.Radhakumar rightly proposes for an authority which can, at the least over see the forms that are required in our armed forces, coast guard, police and intelligence agencies as well as in our financial and cellular services. Radha Suggests for an integreated approach. The essay by Radhakumar is indeed educative and informative.

As Librarians and Knowledge professionals do we have any thing to say in this regard. Is it not timely to brain storm on "Emergency Librarianship", "Disaster Information Systems". Shall I take this opportunity to suggest for addressing the issue in our Seminars and Conferences. How about thinking aloud on "National Information System on Emergencies, disasters and Natural calamities". Every time we complain that we dont get the required recognition and status in society. Unless we address the central core survival issues of society, how do we prove our indispensibility? Let us introspect.... do we have such concerns close to our heart? ... If so is it not our duty to respond to such situations in our own way?

RajLibrarian
lotus5673@yahoo.co.in

Monday, August 18, 2008

KNOWLEDGE AND INNOVATION FOR COMPETITIVENESS IN BRAZIL, By Alberto Rodriguez with Carl Dahlman and Jmil Salmi .- Washington D.C:The World Bank .- 2008


KNOWLEDGE AND INNOVATION FOR COMPETITIVENESS IN BRAZIL By Alberto Rodriguez with Carl Dahlman and Jamil Salmi .- Washington D.C : The World Bank .- 2008, 247p, , pb. : A book review by Rajashekhar Devarai


“Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives”. – James Madison.


Of late Knowledge and Innovation have emerged as new drivers of ‘modern economies’. The ‘Knowledge Dimension of Economic Development is indeed acknowledged in all quarters to mark a paradigm shift in global economic thinking. This World Bank instituted study is quite timely as a bench mark for Middle Income Countries like Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC). Brazil as a country , eighth largest by population and 5th largest by territory, despite its positive initiatives on debt and inflation management and its much acclaimed glory period of 1960-1980 (known as Brazilian Miracle), as a matter of fact averaged only 2.5 percent per annum over the last 10 years., which is about only half the pace of India and China.
This study on Brazil proposes concrete actions in 6 key areas viz., the Enabling Environment, Knowledge Creation and Commercialization, Acquisition of Foreign Knowledge, Leveraging and Dissemination of Technology use, Basic Education and Skills and Tertiary education. The report briefly outlines Brazil’s trails and concerns to raise its living standards and the much desired course of actions charted out by the authors and the World Bank Team, to bring Brazil to innovation ready level. It indeed is a testimony for all Middle Income and Low Income nations to tighten their belts and get ready to reap the multiplier effect of Knowledge and Innovation initiatives to help play their respective roles in Global Knowledge Economy and Society. What is lacking in the study is its total neglect on the front of Environment and Sustainability with reference to growth and development. Never the less, the contents, policy guidelines and development imperatives spelt out in the report are useful to all policy makers, academics , researchers and business people. It also fills the gaps in research with regard to relations between micro economic inputs such as health and education and macro economic outputs such as Growth and Development. The Knowledge Initiative by and large continues to percolate continuously into micro and macro issues and concerns of human life and society!


Rajashekhar Devarai

Monday, July 21, 2008

Reflections on "Say bye to your fears" /Adrian Savage.- Mind over matter : Times of India : June 8, 2008.-



Reflections on "Say bye to your fears" /Adrian Savage.- Mind over matter : Times of India : June 8, 2008.-




Coincidence is really incidental. Realixation of inner truths to me really incidental and unasked for. When we really look at ourselves honestly and unbiased, we are much more than what we arelly are. When we read about people who were different, when we meet people who happen to be achievers.....they all are really unique. They always stand on their own no matter how it costs them. They all resemble to people who have tried untried paths. It is amazing to note that, all unique and daring people were so different from each other ...... but undoubtedly so close to truth.




To quote Adrian, "To stay in your comfort zone because of fears of what may lie outside will condemn you to a life of regret." ....."Nobody is born with an instruction manual for life. Despite all the helpful advice from parents, teachers and elders, each of us must make our own way in the world, doing the best we can and quite often getting things wrong. Missing up a few times is not that big a deal. But if you get scared and try to avoid all mistakes by sticking with just a few tried and true behaviours, you will miss out on most opportunities as well. Lots of people who suffer from boredom at work are doing it to themselves. They are bored and frustrated because that is what their choices have caused them to be. They are stuck in ruts they dug for themselves while trying to avoid making mistakes and taking risks. People who make mistakes never make thny thing else either. "Do something differently and see what happens. Ever the most successful habits eventually lose their usefulness eventually lose their usefulness as events change the world and fresh responses are called for." Be who you are. It is easy to assume that you always have to fit in to get on in the world; that you must confirm to be liked and respected by others or face exclusion. Because most people want to please, they try tryto become what they believe others expect, even if it means forcing themselves to be the kind of person they are not deep down."




To my fellow professionals i.e., Librarians with love :




Dont stay in your comfort zone as a Librarian.




Remove or leave your fears, be it from your boss or library committee or your fellow colleagues or your members/patrons.




Dont live a life of regret.




Be what you are as a Librarian.




Best librarians to a great extent differ from each other.




Go by your inner impulse and inner liking....... it cannot be wrong or in appropriate.




The environment around you is changing fast, your past experience may or may not result in success. Change your attitude, tools and techniques appropriately.






Come out of old habits to find new and creative ideas.




Dear librarian friends, if time tested formulas dont work, do something differently and see what happens.






Friends, indeed I am very much moved by the article/essay written by Adrian Savage. IU thought I must blog my reflections to you. Hope you are sensitised and energiged to be different and unique as you already are!




Best wishes, Be happy, Be smiling....




Rajgbggv1816


July 21, 2008 : 7.24pm

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

A book review by Rajashekhar Devarai : Biotechnology, IPR and Biodiversity / M.B.Rao and Manjula Guru

A book review on Biotechnology, IPR and Biodiversity/M.B.Rao and Manjula Guru
Devarai, R. S.2008. "Biotechnolgy, IPRs and Biodiversity/M.B.Rao and Manjula Guru.,New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley (Pearson Edn), 2007,pp229,Rs.6oo" : A Book Review.- Akruti Journal of Infrastructure.- 1(3)April 2008.,pp250-251.________________________________
It is indeed a challenging task to author a book on the three contemporary topics, viz., ‘Biotechnology, IPRs and Biodiversity’ together placed in relation to each other. The authors M.B.Rao and Manjula Guru claim to have brought out their diverse and multidimensional deliberations on the topics cited above in unison and in interaction and inter relation with each other. One can notice ample of literature on the topics of Biotechnology (BT), Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) and Biodiversity (BD). This literature cuts across disciplinary boundaries, covering various issues with diverse facets. The topics BT, IPR’s and BD have become so common in the media and professional literature, that these have become part and parcel of common sense and conventional wisdom.
It is in this background that the authors in one go, have attempted to analyse the details of the concerns and commitments of the developed and developing countries about issues pertaining to Science, Technology, Policy, social/survival issues directly or indirectly related to BT, IPRs and BD. The book is spread out in ten chapters. Chapter 1 covers the topic ‘biotechnology’ with emphasis on its positive and negative impacts on society. In Chapter 2, the authors give an overview of disastrous effects of Genetically Modified Food (GMFs) and the laws enacted by various countries in this regard for mitigating their harmful effects. Chapters 3 and 4 deal with biotechnology, patent law and the role played by Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) for the conclusion of a ‘binding agreement’ on the conservation of Plant Genetic Resources. Authors lay a special emphasis on the fact that the FAO’s role in this regard did not yield desired results due to opposition of the developed countries. Rao and Guru dwell on issues and concerns like : the need to preserve biodiversity, agreements on the conservation of Flora and Fauna and protection of ecosystems/habitats, backgrounds which led to the signing of the historical Convention on Biodiversity (CBD), The Cartegena Protocol on Biosafety etc in Chapters 5-10. All through the chapters, the authors skillfully glide from science, social science, social work, law to technology easily with ample of comfort to explain the general concerns pertaining to BT, IPR & BD.
The text is a good blend of the experience, exposure and credentials of the authors. Mr. Rao is an advocate and a senior bureaucrat. Ms.Manjula Guru is an advocate at Delhi High Court. She is a member of the American Association of Agricultural Economists. Both of them have number of papers and publications to their credit. The authors are successful in educating the reader on BT, IPR & BD. They have tried to highlight the critical issues like biodiversity laws, vested interests of the developed countries on IPRs and Patents, marginalization of the indigenous people, vested interest of MNCs etc which are a matter of great concern to both developed and developing countries. The authors have crisply brought out the fact of USA not signing the CBD. They have highlighted USA’s concerns over its MNCs and their ‘Biotechnology business’, than about the concerns and issues of developing countries.
By and large the book is a narrative and probably a result mainly of the reading, scholarship and experience of the authors. No study or survey seems to form the base of the deliberations by the authors. Nevertheless this book on Biotechnology, IPRs and Biodiversity is a welcome addition to the already burgeoning list of books in this field. The authors’ efforts are appreciable., as they are successful in sensitizing and raising the curiosities of the readers to know more in this regard.Rajashekhar Devarai